Campus Improvement Plan
2006-2007
The
We are a community of learners working collaboratively to meet individual and collective potential.
The mission
of the
District
Goal 1: The
Campus Goal 1:
Objective 1: Discipline referrals in 2006 will decrease by 25% from 2005.
Correlates with NCLB Goal 4, Objective 4.1.
District
Goal 2: The
Campus Goal 2:
Objective 1: All student groups taking TAKS math, science, reading and writing tests will achieve 90% passing rate for 2006.
Correlates with NCLB Goal 1, Objectives 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3.
District
Goal 3: The
Campus Goal 3:
Objective 1: 100% of students will have one or more family members participate in P.T.O., volunteering, community lab, open houses, class meetings or parent conferences.
Correlates
with NCLB Goal 1, Objectives 1.1, 1.2,
District
Goal 4: The
Campus Goal 4: Objective 1: 100% of paraprofessionals and professional staff members will meet NCLB “highly qualified” criteria.
Correlates with NCLB Goal 1, 3.1, 3.2, 3.3.
District
Goal 5: The
Campus Goal 5:
Objective 1: The attendance rate will improve from 96.4% in 2004-2005 to 97% in 2005-2006.
Correlates with NCLB Goal 1, Objectives 1.1, 1.2, 1.3.
The faculty
and staff at
A
needs assessment is conducted annually and as a result, this plan will be
reviewed and revised as necessary based on data collection.
NEEDS ASSESSMENT
TAKS Data
Performance Rating: Recognized 2004 Desired Rating 2006-2007: Recognized or above
Recognized 2005 Meet AYP
Academically Acceptable 2006
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
TAKS TAKS Amt. of TAKS Amt. of 2006-2007 Needed
2003-2004 2004-2005 Change 2005-2006 Change Expectations Improvement_
Reading All Students 83 91 +8 86 -5 90 +4
African-American 61 72 +11 63 -9 75 +12 Hispanic * 100 * 100 0 90+ none
White 86 96 +10 93 -3 90+ none
Ec. Disadvantaged 72 84 +12 81 -3 90 +9
Writing All Students 91 94.1 + 3 74 -20 80 +14
African-American 75 * * 40 -60 75 +35 Hispanic * 100 * 100 0 90+ none
White >99 91 - 8 83 -6 90 +7 Ec. Disadvantaged 82 86 + 4 83 -3 90 +17
Math All Students 77 86 + 9 80 -6 90 +10
African-American 44 61 + 17 58 -3 75 +16
Hispanic * 100 * 83 -17 90 +7
White 88 93 + 5 89 -4 90 +1 Ec. Disadvantaged 64 76 + 12 78 +2 90 +12
Science All Students 46 71 + 25 68 -3 80 +12 African-American * * * 33 -17 75 +58 Hispanic * * * 100 0 90+ none
White 44 86 + 42 80 -6 90 +10 Ec. Disadvantaged 43 67 + 24 50 -17 75 +25
SDAA > 99 >99 none >99 none >99 none
AYP na Met na Met na Meet none
|
|
||||
|
2006-2007 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal
#: 1 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCLB
Goal: 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective
1: Discipline referrals in 2007 will
remain at or below 10 % (2006
percentage rate). |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCLB
Objective(s): 4.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summative
evaluation: PIEMS 425 report, annual performance report, and student, staff
and parent surveys. |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy |
Resource |
Person Responsible |
Timeline |
Evaluation |
|
Provide
alternatives for disciplinary infractions: lunch detention, ISS, counseling,
on-campus community service |
Counselor |
Principal |
daily |
Discipline
records, conduct folders, conducts grades on report cards |
|
Review,
revise and implement the district/campus crisis management plan. |
Local
funds |
Principal |
Dec-06 |
Crisis
booklets distributed |
|
Provide a
comprehensive guidance plan: Character education , individual counseling |
Counselor,
Safe and Drug Free Schools, local funds |
Principal,
Counselor |
Monthly |
Completed
projects for character education traits, recognized students |
|
Provide
incentives for students exhibiting acceptable and exemplary behavior Ex: Hot
Wheel Races, P.R.I.D.E. |
Activity
funds, P.T.O. |
Principal |
Each six
weeks |
Number of
students recognized |
|
Require
all visitors to the campus to sign in and wear visitor or volunteer tags |
Badges
and sign in/out sheets |
Office
Personnel |
daily |
Sign-in/out
sheets |
|
Require
parents/guardians to sign students out when removing students during the
school day. |
Sign
in/out sheets |
Office
Personnel |
daily |
Sign
in/out sheets |
|
Provide a
field day for students in grades PK-6 as an incentive |
P.T.O.,
local funds |
P.E.
Teacher |
annually |
Number
of students participating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provide a
School-wide Positive Behavior Initiative Policy with embedded positive phone
calls to parents |
Activity
funds |
Principal,
Staff |
annually |
Number of
positive “FISH” calls, Number of discipline referrals |
|
|
|
||||
|
2006-2007 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal
#: 2 |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCLB
Goal: 1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Objective
1: All student groups taking the TAKS math, science, reading and writing test
will achieve 75% or greater passing rate for 2007. |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCLB
Objective(s): 1.1, 1.2, 1.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summative
evaluation: TAKS scores in math, reading, writing and science for grades 3-6. |
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Strategy |
Resource |
Person Responsible |
Timeline |
Evaluation |
|
|
All
teachers will receive copies of the TEKS/TAKS objectives for the 2006-2007
school year. |
Title
I $200 |
Principal |
Aug-06 |
Sign out
sheets for TEKS/TAKS materials. |
|
|
All
teachers in grades K-6 will incorporate TAKS objectives into their daily
curriculum and TAKS format in evaluations such as multiple choice
for spelling. |
TAKS
practice materials, Title I $2000 |
Teachers,
Principal |
Monitor
each six weeks |
Review of
lesson plans and tests administered in grades 1-6. Materials purchased. |
|
|
Released
TAKS tests will be used as a pre-test for all student
in grades 3-6. AEIS-IT scoring through ESC VI (Release
SDAA and in-house scoring for Sp. Ed. students) |
Title
I $500 |
Principal |
Sept. 06 Nov 06 |
AEIS-IT
data from pre-test |
|
|
Provide
after school instruction for at-risk students in reading, math, science and
writing. |
State
Compensatory Education funds $15,000 |
Teachers,
Principal |
October
2006 through May 2007 |
Number of
students attending after school. Progress on TEKS/TAKS objectives, six weeks
report cards |
|
|
Provide
intensive tutorials 30 minutes daily for students in need of additional
instruction in reading, science, math and writing |
SCE
$2000 Tutorial period |
Principal |
daily |
Progress
on TEKS/TAKS objectives using computerized testing, six weeks report cards |
|
|
Individualized
and small and flexible group reading and math instruction for grades 1-6
identified by testing to be at-risk for reading disabilities including
dyslexia |
Title I
$36,000 |
Teachers,
Principal |
daily |
|
|
|
Provide
Optional Extended Year Program for students exhibiting the need for
additional instruction in TEKS objectives for those at-risk for failure |
OEYP
funds $1.364; ARI/AMI $2,885 |
Teachers,
Principal, School Secretary |
October
2006-May 2007 |
Report
card grades, Computerized assessments, PEIMS 4th submission |
|
|
Integrate
writing into all curriculum areas through the use of journals, technology
products, etc. |
Title I
$300 |
All
staff, Principal |
weekly |
Lesson
plans, finished projects, writing samples |
|
|
Incorporate
hands-on science activities for all students using science lab reports to
summarize activities |
Local
funds SRSA
$1000 |
All
staff, Principal |
every six
weeks |
Lesson
plans, finished projects/reports |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporate
Voyager Passport Reading for at-risk students in Kindergarten - grade 6. |
Title I,
$3000 IDEA-B
Funds $5,000 |
All
staff, Principal |
daily |
Lesson
plans, principal walk throughs |
|
|
Incorporate
Early Math Intervention techniques in grades K through 6 (possibly change to/ add Voyager Math) |
SRSA$1000 IDEA B
Funds $5000 |
All
staff, Principal |
daily |
Lesson
plans, principal walk throughs |
|
|
|
||||
|
2006-2007 |
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goal
#: 2 |
||||